Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Cancer prevention is a reality

The Go Public cancer forum in Ottawa had many high powered, interesting speakers; most of them talked about the prevention of cancer as well as cancer control.

I’ve attended many cancer conferences, and I’ve never heard so much talk about cancer prevention. The figures are amazing; in general they range from 30% to 50%, with someone saying that 95% of cancer is preventable.

Why are so many people dying if we know that cancer can be prevented? Cancer rates are rising not falling – if we continue as we are, then 1 in 2 males and 1 in 3 females will have cancer by 2050. Today most people know someone who has cancer and we are all affected by this; imagine what it will be like when the rates are so much higher. Our thinking has to change if we’re serious about preventing cancer and reducing cancer deaths by half in the next generation.

It’s amazing we haven’t figured this out yet with all the money that goes in to research, but I know the fact that we’re human beings is a big part of the problem. For example, we all know about the foods that are bad for us; but as Dr. Andrew Weil said on the Larry King show, people eat what’s cheap and accessible. It’s easy to expect the health care system to fix the problems we bring on ourselves by over eating bad chemicals in food, and being a nation of people who love the taste of fats, oils, salt and sugar.

Changing habits can be difficult if we’re not committed. I know – I faced my mortality in 1987 with breast, colon and skin cancer. I would be dead by now if I hadn’t made a commitment to get well, and worked hard at improving my diet, exercise, relaxation, and stress levels.

I think one key factor is that I had a coach to help me. I wanted to change, but I didn’t believe I could do it, and I know many people who struggle with the same issue. If people are serious about wanting to change, and they partner with a coach, either a professional or a friend, they can achieve so much more than they can achieve alone.

Preventing cancer involves making healthy choices for what we eat, how we exercise, how long we sleep, and how well we manage our stress levels. These are the main factors, but many other issues are involved. I believe it’s important to let go of what gets in the way of us living a healthy life; the past is over and cannot be undone. We can all start now – right here – right now and go forward to a healthy future where we love ourselves enough to take good care of the mind, body and spirit we were blessed with when we were born.

Take action now so that you and your loved ones will not be surprised with a diagnosis of cancer. Start from here to go forward and find your own way to build a healthy life. The time to act is now!

Monday, October 5, 2009

Nobelpreis: Physiologie/Medizin 2009

Die diesjährigen Nobelpreisträger im Bereich Physiologie/Medizin wurden bekannt gegeben. Es handelt sich um Elizabeth H. Blackburn, Carol W. Greider und Jack W. Szostak. Die Auszeichnung teilen sie sich für die Aufschlüsselung, wie Chromosomen von Telomeren und dem Enzym Telomerase beschützt werden. Das ist u.a. wichtig für die Krebsforschung, da Telomerase in Krebszellen dafür sorgt, dass diese sich unendlich oft teilen können und so im Körper wuchern. Im Umkehrschluss hängen Telomere mit dem Absterben andere Zellen nach vielen Teilungen zusammen.

Snip von Wikipedia:

Das Enzym stellt die Endstücke der Chromosomen, die so genannten Telomere, wieder her. Bei jeder Zellteilung geht ein Stück (ca. 100 Nukleotide) der Telomere verloren. Die Telomerase verhindert in bestimmten Zellen durch die Wiederherstellung der Telomere, dass die Chromosomen mit jeder Zellteilung kürzer werden und umgeht so das End-Replikationsproblem. Dieses entsteht, da die DNA-Polymerase DNA nach Bindung von Primern von 5′ nach 3′ repliziert. Da die Primer aus RNA bestehen, werden diese nach der Replikation wieder durch eine RNase H aus dem neuen DNA-Strang entfernt und die Lücke mit Hilfe der Polymerase I durch Desoxynukleotiden gefüllt. Die entstandenen Fragmente werden anschließend durch eine DNA-Ligase verknüpft. Da dies an den Enden nicht möglich ist und der Primer nur entfernt wird, geht ein Teil der Information verloren und die Enden werden somit ohne Telomerase bei jeder Replikation verkürzt.

Bis Montag, den 12.10 werden noch die Preise aus den anderen Kategorien vergeben.

Today’s Phenomenon of Preferred Ignorance

Ignorance is no longer just for the blissful, it’s also for the sane.

For those who haven’t read my introductory post, I’m a receptionist at a small family practice clinic. Recently, I seem to lead a double life: one as an under-spoken secretary who knows her place and makes the damn coffee with a smile, the other as a hungry student looking for knowledge and truth that even my most highest authorities have not yet grasped.

I encountered something strange today as I opened my big mouth (something I sometimes do when I foolishly, momentarily believe someone might listen to the girl who answers the phones). Despite my better judgment, I proceeded to tell a nurse about the statistics I have found on the W.H.O website while doing a simple search regarding silver dental fillings and mercury. The response I got was less than favorable as she told me to “calm down, Katie. You don’t want to be like Suzy Johnson.” * She later continued the conversation by telling me I was acting “weird” and “obsessive” – all because I was concerned about one of the world’s leading health organizations admitting people were getting metal poisoning from one of the most common health practices: dental fillings.

Suzy is a patient who belongs in a psych ward much more so than a family doctor, always insisting the air itself is made of nickel and poisons her body. She gets heir hair strands regularly tested. On top of that, she’s a witch.

Now, despite the nurse telling me she was “totally joking,” I know only half of her meant it. My manager is another woman guilty of telling me I read too much and need to stop before I become obsessive. “You read some sad stuff,” she says. “Why don’t you read some Twilight?”

I don’t know when education and knowledge became something to be embarrassed of, but it desperately needs to stop. As a biology student who plans to go into medicine, I’m proud of my desire to know the truth. I’m proud of the amount of books I read, and I’m proud on the energy and time I spend trying to educate myself. I’ll be a better doctor for it. My future patients will be healthier because of it. It isn’t only that I’m not receiving words of encouragement from my co-workers; I’m being torn in the opposite direction and being blatantly told that I’m going overboard. And, of all people, by medical professionals. Medical professionals are telling me to stop reading so much about the medical profession. Isn’t there something wrong with that?

I’m sick of keeping my mouth shut, and the next time my co-worker tells me to put down the books, I won’t be so nice. Ignorance isn’t “cool,” and it should not be accepted by people as the norm, or interpreted as sanity. It’s time people realize that doctors are people just like the rest of us who only repeat what a higher authority deemed as fact. They only know that which they were exposed to, which isn’t always the truth. It’s time we stop putting some of the most toxic elements into our body – completely voluntarily – because our doctor insists it’s okay. You don’t have to have a medical degree to know that putting the most toxic metals into your body isn’t okay, and you don’t have to have passed medical school to be able to grasp that metal’s toxicity. Don’t feel intimidated by the information or the degrees on their walls. Be your own health advocate, because you are smart enough. You are capable of knowing something your doctor doesn’t. It is absolutely possible (as a matter of fact, common place) that your doctor may promote a practice that is hazardous to your health. Let’s keep in mind that although most doctors truly have every intention of supporting your health and overall well-being, they’re just as capable of being gullibly convinced of something that isn’t true as we are. It happens every day.

Don’t take my word for any of this, for Christ’s sake, read! Find information from both sides of the debate and go where your common sense leads you – not where “public opinion” leads you.

* name has been changed.

Friday, October 2, 2009

My Last and Final Blog

This really is my last blog.  Hardly anybody reads this stuff anymore anyway.  I’ll say no more here until I’ve got a finished Constitution for a new state and a renewed people.

So I’ll get on with it. 

 Today is the anniversary of Orville Wright’s flight to over 1000 feet; another first for the Wrights, and humanity.  Comte de Lambert of France beat that record just sixteen days later.  From there our machines went further and faster beyond the speed of sound and past the solar system…all within a hundred years.  It took thousands of years to go from stone to bronze to steel. 

It’s good to recall what engineers and scientists and entrepreneurs have done for our present comforts and longevity in just the past hundred years.  Because, too often, politicians take credit for what should be properly attributed to refrigerated food supplies, antibiotics, time/labor-saving devices, and information technology from printing presses to Twitter. 

By the work of our finest minds and hands, we should have much more leisure, much more wealth, much more productive and happy lives than we do.  But we’re working longer and harder for less and less because we’ve never learned the lessons of I Samuel: 8, and we have, with our hands and minds and votes said, “In Politicians We Trust.”

The terms “conservative” and “liberal” have swapped and morphed and devolved so much that it’s now pointless to discuss what these terms mean today.  Ditto the groups we call “Democratic Party” and “Republican Party;” the labels are actually implying the opposite of what they did a hundred years ago.  So let’s just throw those labels in the dustbin for a while.

For the past hundred years, despite all the innovation and produce of our age, almost all politics can be boiled down to two key groups asking only two questions:

  1. How can I get Free Money (FM)?
  2. How can I get Other People’s Money (OPM)?

As far as I can tell, the FMers believe in magic.  I’ve spoken to many FMers who actually believe that government can simply print money with no ill effects.  And despite what most Republicans would say about themselves, they mostly fall into this group.  They believe in political management of economics just as much as the OPMers do, and are more prone to put on blinders of faith and zealotry in defense of the indefensible.  (C’mon…how can anybody defend George W Bush, let alone vote for him…twice?)

On the other side, the OPM-addicted want income redistribution because they think they understand human evil, and want to punish it.  Rich OPMers know that poor people are fools and don’t know what to do with their money.  Poor OPMers know that rich people are evil, and don’t deserve their riches.  Both sides are more right than they’d like to believe, as in this case, it takes one to know one.  Rich folks are fools if they think that brains and hard work alone got them where they are today; and poor folks are evil in coveting their rich brethren’s wealth.

While the constitutional convention of 1787 was a power grab, and socialism was born in Indiana some nine score and ten years ago, the seeds of our current destruction were actually planted about a hundred years ago, when powerful investment bankers began hatching a plan to take over the nation by turning a previously independent-minded, mistrustful and self-reliant populace into a Rob Peter to Pay Paul, FM versus OPM.tug of war.

And by 1913, it was all fact.  Our money was stolen and replaced with “fiat currency” IOUs. 

This is why I admire Ludwig von Mises.   He wrote this about fiat currency in 1953:

“It is certainly possible to go on for a while in the expansionist routine of deficit spending by borrowing from the commercial banks and supporting the government bond market.

But after some time it will be imperative to stop. Otherwise the public will become alarmed about the future of the dollar’s purchasing power and a panic will follow. As soon as one stops, however, all the unwelcome consequences of the aftermath of inflation will be experienced. The longer the preceding period of expansion has lasted, the more unpleasant those consequences will be.

The attitude of a great many people with regard to inflation is ambivalent. They are aware, on the one hand, of the dangers inherent in a continuation of the policy of pumping more and more money into the economic system. But as soon as anything substantial is done to stop increasing the amount of money, they begin to cry out about high interest rates and bearish conditions on the stock and commodity exchanges. They are loath to relinquish the cherished illusion which ascribes to government and central banks the magic power to make people happy by endless spending and inflation.”

We’ve been inflating the monetary policy bubble at least since 1913, and probably in truth since about 1909, when bankers started to play the market like a fiddle and gain key allies in politics, support for income tax grew wings, and Taft’s list of errors laid the groundwork for Wilson’s victory in 1912. 

It will indeed hurt a great deal when we are forced to stop the money presses, and I believe that is about to happen.

But I also must personally eat a little crow.

During the 2000 gubernatorial campaign I’d predicted that we’d get the Great Smack-down within ten years.  During the 2008 campaign I’d said that it’d happen by the end of this summer or at least by late fall.  But I think I’m wrong. 

It’s my opinion that our fiat currency is held aloft by force and intimidation.  I’d thought that by now the USA would have been so badly rotted from the inside and indebted to the outside that surely other global powers would’ve pushed us into the dust bin.  Maybe I’d underestimated how screwed up other nations really are, and how their own internal rot and debt has sunk all ships of state down into the muck of debt-currency malaise.  Maybe I’ve missed some screamingly important facts that elude me still. 

But this is good news.  Up to now I’ve been depressingly right in the broad brushstrokes of economic and social decay, and in the specifics of timing.  But if I’m so off base about the collapse of the dollar, at least in my timing predictions, then maybe there’s hope where I have lately seen none.

Maybe voters aren’t terminally thoughtless and blind after all.  Maybe we’ll snap out of our entrancement with the Great Golem of State, and recall how this nation started…and who we once were.

But just as with our nation’s founders, it will take pain.  Lots of pain.  More than we feel now.  Our overly-revered founders had to get shot at and oppressed in ways we can scarcely imagine from our comfortable view of the world.

And that, I am more convinced than ever, is just around the corner.

Prepare.

The 2009 IgNobel Prize winners

The IgNobel Prize is a parody of the Nobel Prize and are given each year in early October for ten achievements that “first make people laugh, and then make them think”. They are organised by by the Harvard-based humour magazine Annals of Improbable Research.[SOURCE]

Here are the winners announced yesterday… there’s some pretty decent bar ammo here. Grab some coffee.. its Friday..practically weekend..enjoy.

VETERINARY MEDICINE PRIZE: Catherine Douglas and Peter Rowlinson of Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK, for showing that cows who have names give more milk than cows that are nameless. REFERENCE: “Exploring Stock Managers’ Perceptions of the Human-Animal Relationship on Dairy Farms and an Association with Milk Production”

PEACE PRIZE: Stephan Bolliger, Steffen Ross, Lars Oesterhelweg, Michael Thali and Beat Kneubuehl of the University of Bern, Switzerland, for determining — by experiment — whether it is better to be smashed over the head with a full bottle of beer or with an empty bottle.
REFERENCE: “Are Full or Empty Beer Bottles Sturdier and Does Their Fracture-Threshold Suffice to Break the Human Skull?”

MEDICINE PRIZE: Donald L. Unger, of Thousand Oaks, California, USA, for investigating a possible cause of arthritis of the fingers, by diligently cracking the knuckles of his left hand — but never cracking the knuckles of his right hand — every day for more than sixty (60) years.
REFERENCE: “Does Knuckle Cracking Lead to Arthritis of the Fingers?”

ECONOMICS PRIZE: The directors, executives, and auditors of four Icelandic banks — Kaupthing Bank, Landsbanki, Glitnir Bank, and Central Bank of Iceland — for demonstrating that tiny banks can be rapidly transformed into huge banks, and vice versa — and for demonstrating that similar things can be done to an entire national economy.

CHEMISTRY PRIZE: Javier Morales, Miguel Apátiga, and Victor M. Castaño of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, for creating diamonds from liquid — specifically from tequila.
REFERENCE: “Growth of Diamond Films from Tequila”

 

PHYSICS PRIZE: Katherine K. Whitcome of the University of Cincinnati, USA, Daniel E. Lieberman of Harvard University, USA, and Liza J. Shapiro of the University of Texas, USA, for analytically determining why pregnant women don’t tip over.
REFERENCE: “Fetal Load and the Evolution of Lumbar Lordosis in Bipedal Hominins,”

LITERATURE PRIZE: Ireland’s police service (An Garda Siochana), for writing and presenting more than fifty traffic tickets to the most frequent driving offender in the country — Prawo Jazdy — whose name in Polish means “Driving License”.
PUBLIC HEALTH PRIZE: Elena N. Bodnar, Raphael C. Lee, and Sandra Marijan of Chicago, Illinois, USA, for inventing a brassiere that, in an emergency, can be quickly converted into a pair of gas masks, one for the brassiere wearer and one to be given to some needy bystander.
REFERENCE: U.S. patent # 7255627, granted August 14, 2007 for a “Garment Device Convertible to One or More Facemasks.”

MATHEMATICS PRIZE: Gideon Gono, governor of Zimbabwe’s Reserve Bank, for giving people a simple, everyday way to cope with a wide range of numbers — from very small to very big — by having his bank print bank notes with denominations ranging from one cent ($.01) to one hundred trillion dollars ($100,000,000,000,000).
REFERENCE: Zimbabwe’s Casino Economy — Extraordinary Measures for Extraordinary Challenges

BIOLOGY PRIZE: Fumiaki Taguchi, Song Guofu, and Zhang Guanglei of Kitasato University Graduate School of Medical Sciences in Sagamihara, Japan, for demonstrating that kitchen refuse can be reduced more than 90% in mass by using bacteria extracted from the feces of giant pandas.
REFERENCE: “Microbial Treatment of Kitchen Refuse With Enzyme-Producing Thermophilic Bacteria From Giant Panda Feces,”

Thursday, October 1, 2009

It’s Official: Barack Obama Has Now Replaced Jesus Christ

(A brief intro)

I think we have finally reached the end.
Then again, I could be (and probably am) wrong.
For over a year now, I have been watching the insane antics of diehard Obama supporters, the ones that I call the Kool-Aid Brigade.
It wouldn’t matter what section of the cult that they were associated with, Organizing For America, ACORN, or just your run-of-the-mill everyday liberal loonies.
Each time I would see or hear of some totally outrageous stunt that they had pulled, I would think to myself:
“That’s it.”
“They couldn’t possibly disconnect from reality any further than that.”
Once again, the followers of the Chosen One have proved me wrong.

Years ago, John Lennon raised an uproar when he made a statement to the effect that the Beatles had become more popular than Jesus Christ.

I have always taken that to mean that he was saying that more young people were listening to Beatles…Read the rest of this entry

Pulse-less Artificial Hearts

Artificial hearts were first developed in the 20th century, but they haven’t been practical devices for long-term implantation until just recently. Here’s a story about the first implantation of a promising new type of artificial heart that lacks the pulsation of a real heart: http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_436300.html

This article from 2006 describes some more details of the technology: http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/17523/

It seems that by doing away with the pulse, this artificial heart is able to be significantly simpler, smaller, and more robust than presently approved models. Instead of lasting for about 2 years, it can last for 10. Instead of being too large to fit into most women, it’s small enough to fit in virtually anyone. However, there are worries that the lack of a pulse could cause unforeseen issues in patients…I suppose we’ll see soon enough. Also, when I mentioned it to Matthew, he pointed out that in a disaster a first-responder might classify someone with such a heart as dead due to the lack of pulse.

In any case though, it’s good to see such progress in the development of artificial hearts. An artificial heart that is as good as a real heart would be a real lifesaver. According to the Wikipedia article on heart transplants, there’s need for about 800,000 heart transplants each year, but only about 3,500 that can actually go through each year due to an extreme shortage of donor hearts. Effective artificial hearts could save several million lives in a decade. It might even be able to save more lives than that, as it would be a much easier decision to implant, leading to more cases being considered for implantation, including lost causes and as a preventative measure in less developed cases. It might even be possible to keep such hearts on hand for emergencies, unlike transplants, though transplanting them in an emergency could be difficult. It might also be possible to do detection (or even control) within the artificial heart, so that subtle signs of trouble could be detected by the heart and the patient warned before a catastrophic event, so the patient can get to a hospital and the problem resolved before the heart fails. One last possibility is that a sufficiently small heart transplant could lead to the implantation of redundant hearts, so that a single failure would not necessarily be disastrous.

All of this could lead to longer lives, which is a good thing.